Bob Ant
Active Member
My experience with a 2003 XB is that the chopper II runs better than the ET. Based on what I hear and read the 2002's like the ET better. Reading the Merc Racing 2006 literature about props the Chopper II gerenates max bow lift and the ET gererates medium bow lift.
Based on air flow and my experience with both props this makes sense. Unfortunately my Chopper II lies at the bottom Lake Chicuamauga with half a prop shaft in it. Thats why I have been working with my ET.
Now my question. They allso rate the Tempest Plus 28P as a prop to run at 70 plus and it also gererated max bow lift. Anybody had the opportunity to compare the chopperII to the tempest plus. (Note that they rate the ChopperII as a prop for 60 plus with Max bow lift.)
Look forward to any feedback.
Bob A.
Based on air flow and my experience with both props this makes sense. Unfortunately my Chopper II lies at the bottom Lake Chicuamauga with half a prop shaft in it. Thats why I have been working with my ET.
Now my question. They allso rate the Tempest Plus 28P as a prop to run at 70 plus and it also gererated max bow lift. Anybody had the opportunity to compare the chopperII to the tempest plus. (Note that they rate the ChopperII as a prop for 60 plus with Max bow lift.)
Look forward to any feedback.
Bob A.